Hayes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 P.H., Case No. 19-cv-04800-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 19 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff P.H.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. P.H. claims that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in evaluating certain medical opinions, which in turn led to a flawed assessment of P.H.’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”). The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers and the relevant evidence of record, for the reasons set forth below,…