Carney
Carney v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAYMIE EILEEN MARIE CARNEY, Case No. 19-cv-04265-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL, Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Jaymie Eileen Marie Carney applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and Child Disability Benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act in 2013. Having finally reached this court, she moves for summary judgment because of several material errors by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The Commissioner cross-moves for summary judgment. The record is fully developed and the ALJ failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting significant evidence. If the improperly discredited evidence were credited as true, the ALJ would be required to find Carney disabled on remand; there is no serious doubt that she is disabled. Carney’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the case is…