Cottrell

Cottrell v. AT&T Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20213:19-cv-07672California1,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID COTTRELL, Case No. 19-cv-07672-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

AND DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE

AT&T INC., et al., MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 66,

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David Cottrell moves for leave to amend to add claims against two additional affiliates of Defendants AT&T Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., and DIRECTV LLC (collectively, “AT&T”). AT&T does not oppose Cottrell amending to add claims against AT&T Services, Inc., but opposes the addition of claims against AT&T Mobility Services, LLC (“AT&T Mobility”) on the basis that such amendment would be futile. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing previous set for March 19, 2021. For the reasons discussed below, Cottrell’s motion for leave to amend is GRANTED except as to a claim the Court previously dismissed, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.