Thornton

Thornton v. Daly City

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20213:19-cv-07638California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CURTIS THORNTON, Case No. 19-cv-07638-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISQUALIFY

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 51, 52 DALY CITY, et al., Defendants. 12 On March 17, 2021, Plaintiff Curtis Thornton (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to disqualify the undersigned judge, see Dkt. No. 51, followed by an amended motion to disqualify, see Dkt. No. 52 (“Mot.”). The motion to disqualify is DENIED. Plaintiff moves to recuse the undersigned based on: the May 31st, 1870 Act to enforce the Right of Citizens of the United States to vote in the several States of this Union and for other Purposes, 18 U.S. Code § 2383 (Insurrection and Rebellion), the April 15th, 1861, Presidential Proclamation declaring insurrection and rebellion against US law, 18 USC 1590 (Trafficking in Forced Labor), the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Mot. at 1.1 21 Motions to disqualify, or recuse, a judge fall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.