Wade

Wade v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20213:06-cv-02346California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 E. K. WADE, Case No. 06-cv-02346-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AMENDED

v. MOTION TO REOPEN

UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA, Defendant.

In 2005 and 2006, Plaintiff E.K. Wade filed twenty-four lawsuits in the Northern District of California, eight of which related to problems he experienced at Veterans Administration hospitals. See Order Granting Mot. for SJ (dkt. 82) at 1–2. In some of the lawsuits, Wade asserted claims based on a VA hospital’s refusal to fill his prescription for Prednisone. Id. at 2. In this lawsuit, by contrast, he asserted claims based on an allegedly negligent decision to give him Prednisone. Id. On August 24, 2007, the Court granted the government’s motion for summary judgment after Wade failed to file any opposition. See id. Now, over thirteen years later, Wade has moved to reopen this case and vacate the judgment against him. See Amend. Mot. to Reopen (dkt. 87). He argues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.