Wells

Wells v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20215:19-cv-01345California7,807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE C. WELLS, Case No. 19-01345 EJD (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MENDOCINO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants. (Docket No. 29)

17 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the time of the events underlying this action, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office and its employees. Dkt. Nos. 1, 20. The Court found the complaint stated cognizable claims and ordered the matter served on Defendants Sgt. Siderakis, Sgt. Johnston,2 Deputy Grant, Capt. Timothy Pearce,3 Sgt. Saye, Deputy Leon, and Deputy

1 Plaintiff later filed an amendment to the complaint, to provide additional facts in support of his claim. Dkt. No. 20. Accordingly, the operative complaint in this matter is comprised of the documents filed under Docket Nos. 1 and 20. See Dkt. No. 27 at 2.

2 Plaintiff originally identified this defendant as “Johnson,” but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.