Moore

Moore v. Addus Healthcare, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20214:19-cv-01519California8,490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY MOORE, Case No. 19-cv-01519-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

CLASS CERTIFICATION

v. Re: Dkt. No. 72 ADDUS HEALTHCARE, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Named Plaintiff’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for class certification See Dkt. No. 72 (“Mot.”), 81 (“Opp.”), 82 (“Reply”). On August 27, 2020, the Court held a hearing on the motion for class certification. Dkt. No. 84. After carefully considering the parties’ arguments, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion for class certification. I. BACKGROUND On July 11, 2017, Plaintiff Mary Moore filed this putative wage and hour class action against Addus Healthcare, Inc. in Alameda Superior Court. See Dkt. No. 1-2 Ex. A. On March 21, 2019, an amended complaint was filed, adding Alexandria Encinias as a Plaintiff and Addus HomeCare, Inc. as a Defendant. See Dkt. No. 1-15 Ex. N (“FAC”). Defendants (“Addus”) removed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.