McGhee

McGhee v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20214:20-cv-05135California1,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIJUE ADOLPHUS MCGHEE, Case No. 20-cv-05135-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. R.JAIME-DAUMY, et al., Defendants. 12 Plaintiff has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that while he was housed at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), SQSP officers Jaime-Daumy and Wren violated his constitutional rights. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DISCUSSION I. Background On August 11, 2020, Plaintiff informed the Court that he had moved to an unspecified motel in Oakland, California, and did not provide the Court with a specific address at which he could be reached, as required by Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-11. Dkt. No. 7. On September 28, 2020, the Court screened the complaint. The Court found that the complaint stated cognizable First, Sixth, and Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.