Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL ORTIZ, Case No. 17-cv-03820-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS IN

v. LIMINE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO

MAKING SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS AT

AMAZON.COM LLC, et al., TRIAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 212-213, 216

12 Now before the Court are Defendants’ motions in limine to exclude any and all evidence regarding: (1) specific experiences of managers other than Plaintiff or Level 4 Shift Managers at the specific facilities where Plaintiff worked during the time he worked at those facilities; (2) processes, staffing, or volume at delivery stations other than the three facilities at which Plaintiff worked; and (3) Defendants’ policies and practices before February 1, 2016 and after December 11, 2016.1 Defendants argue this evidence should be excluded because it is not relevant to Plaintiff’s individual claims. In the alternative, Defendants argue it should be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 because the…