Amerson

Amerson v. Adobe Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20215:21-cv-00359California721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CHRISTOPHER A AMERSON, Case No. 21-cv-00359-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT

v. UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915

ABODE SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

12 The Court has received Mr. Amerson’s amended complaint. See Am. Compl., ECF 16. Mr. Amerson has been granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis, and, accordingly, the Court screens the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). A complaint filed by any person proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is subject to a mandatory and sua sponte review and dismissal by the Court if it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 19 The Court notes that Mr. Amerson’s complaint suffers from the same issues identified by 20 Judge Nathanael…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.