Johnson v. City of Pittsburg

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20213:20-cv-07129California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-07129-SK

Plaintiff,

NOTICE OF QUESTIONS FOR

v. HEARING

CITY OF PITTSBURG,

Defendant.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON APRIL 5, 2021 AT 9:30 A.M. The Court intends to address the questions below at the hearing. If, in response to a question in this notice, any party intends to rely on authorities not previously cited to the Court, that party is ORDERED to notify the Court and opposing counsel of these authorities by no later than March 29, 2021. Moreover, the Court advises the parties that it will not accept written answers to this question. The parties shall be prepared to address the following questions at the hearing: 1. California’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions applies to § 1983 claims. Butler v. Nat’l Community Renaissance of California,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.