Roley

Roley v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20215:18-cv-07537California5,713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ANDREW ROLEY, Case No. 18-cv-07537-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GOOGLE LLC, [Re: ECF 105] Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Andrew Roley received an email from Google advertising the availability of one terabyte of Google Drive storage. When Mr. Roley discovered that terabyte of storage was not free forever, he sued. Before the Court is Google’s motion for summary judgment, which seeks to have this Court decide as a matter of law that the communications sent to Mr. Roley and other class members were not a unilateral contract and that Mr. Roley was not justified in relying on the email as a purported offer of free storage for life. See Mot., ECF 105. Mr. Roley opposes this motion. See Opp’n, ECF 110. The Court agrees with Google that, as a matter of law, there is no unilateral contract and GRANTS summary judgment on the class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.