Bush

Bush v. Brown Farms

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20213:20-cv-03275California825 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM DAVID BUSH, Case No. 20-cv-03275-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE OSC AND DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT

BROWN FARMS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendants.

12 In May 2020, pro se plaintiff William David Bush sued defendants Brown Farms, the City of Santa Rosa, and 20 Doe defendants, for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 6. As detailed in the Court’s recent Order to Show Cause, the case was referred to a magistrate judge for an early settlement conference at the parties’ joint request, but the conference was not held because Bush failed to appear. Dkt. No. 19 (Order to Show Cause). The magistrate judge ordered Bush to show cause in writing by December 4, 2020, for not appearing and for failing to submit a required settlement conference statement. Dkt. No. 18. Bush never responded to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.