Hughes

United States v. Hughes

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20213:18-cv-05931California2,141 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 18-cv-05931-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL AND MOTION TO STRIKE

TIMBERLY E. HUGHES, Re: Dkt. Nos. 104, 116 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Timberly Hughes, pro se, moves to compel Plaintiff the United States to produce an unredacted copy of a document that the United States redacted based on the deliberative process privilege and attorney-client privilege. Hughes also moves to strike certain statements in the United States’ case management statement and in its portion of a joint discovery letter brief. For the reasons discussed below, both motions are DENIED.1 II. MOTION TO COMPEL

Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.