Noa

Noa v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20213:19-cv-06366California5,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 POLAVAA N. Case No. 19-cv-06366-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant.

14 Plaintiff seeks social security benefits for a variety of physical and mental impairments including congestive heart failure, diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, morbid obesity, lumbar radiculopathy, sprains and strains, hypertension, depression disorder, and anxiety disorder. (Administrative Record (AR) 1335.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment.1 (Dkt. Nos. 28, 29.) After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.