Roberts

Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20214:19-cv-02935California1,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES EVERETT HUNT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02935-HSG Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 128 BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike portions of Lead Plaintiff James Hunt’s Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 128 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND On May 28, 2019, Plaintiff Elissa M. Roberts filed this putative class action. Dkt. No. 1. Three other interested plaintiffs then timely moved for appointment as lead plaintiff, including James Everett Hunt. See Dkt. Nos. 10, 14, 17. After the other two motions were withdrawn, Mr. Hunt was the sole remaining movant. See Dkt. Nos. 21, 37. On September 3, 2019, the Court1 granted Mr. Hunt’s unopposed motion and appointed him as the Lead Plaintiff of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.