Holland
Holland v. City of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL HOLLAND, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02545-SI
Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., JUDGMENT
Defendants.
13 On February 26, 2021, the Court heard oral argument on a motion for summary judgment, filed by defendants the City and County of San Francisco, Eric Tindall, William Petersen, Donald Sakayama, Anthony Watson, Robert Navarro, and Arturo Ramirez (collectively defendants). Having considered the arguments made and papers submitted in support thereof, the Court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion for summary judgment in full for the reasons articulated below.
BACKGROUND1
20 On December 6, 2018, at approximately 10:50 pm, mall security officers, Chris Ferrari and 21 Mark Hankins, were on patrol and noticed a Ford Explorer and a silver Infinity Q45 parked well 22 after closing2 near a construction site adjacent to Macy’s3 in Stonestown Mall, San Francisco.. Dkt. 23 24 1…