Montanocordoba

Montanocordoba v. Contra Costa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20214:18-cv-05682California11,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANESHEA MONTANOCORDOBA, Case No. 18-cv-05682-PJH Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING

v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY’S AND

DETECTIVE ANN SHIRAISHI’S

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et. al., MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 61, 64, 67, 71, 80, 85

Defendants Contra Costa County’s (the “County”) and Detective Ann Shiraishi’s (“Shiraishi”) (collectively, “defendants”) respective motions for summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on February 4, 2021. Plaintiff Daneshea Montanocordoba (“plaintiff”) appeared through her counsel, Christopher S. Patterson and Michael L. Fox. The County appeared through its counsel, Patrick L. Hurley. Shiraishi appeared through her counsel, Noah G. Blechman. On March 3, 2021, the court granted and denied in part the County’s motion and granted Shiraishi’s motion. Dkt. 80. The court has reconsidered that order. Dkt. 94. In light of such reconsideration, the court issues the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.