Bailey

Bailey v. Santa Clara County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20214:21-cv-00279California991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASPER BAILEY, Case No. 21-cv-00279-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Correctional Training Facility in Soledad, California, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.