Sayce

Sayce v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20213:20-cv-00076California5,606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER L. SAYCE, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00076-SI

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et Re: Dkt. Nos. 127, 129 al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court are motions to dismiss, filed by defendant Forescout Technologies Inc. (“Forescout”) and individual defendants Michael DeCesare and Christopher Harms (collectively “individual defendants”). Dkt. No. 127; 129. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Forescout’s motion to dismiss and GRANTS individual defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Court GRANTS plaintiffs Christopher Sayce, Meitav Tachlit Mutual Funds Ltd., The Arbitrage Fund, Water Island merger Arbitrage Institutional Comingled Master Fund LP, Water Island LevArb Fund, LP, Water island Diversified Event-Driven Fund (collectively “plaintiffs”) leave to amend. 20 BACKGROUND I. Factual Background The following allegations are taken from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.