Perks

Perks v. Activehours, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20215:19-cv-05543California5,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MARY PERKS and STANLEY ALEXANDER, Case No. 5:19-cv-05543-BLF individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated., [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Plaintiffs, Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement and for Approval of v. Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Service Awards

ACTIVEHOURS, INC. D/B/A EARNIN,

14 Defendant.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Mary Perks and Stanley Alexander, together with Defendant ActiveHours, Inc. (d/b/a “Earnin”), entered into a Settlement Agreement on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of similarly situated customers. ECF No. 45-2. The Court certified the Settlement Class, granted preliminary approval to the Settlement, directed notice of the Settlement be distributed to the Settlement Class, and scheduled a hearing on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.