Total Recall Technologies v. Palmer Luckey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 12 TOTAL RECALL TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff, No. C–15–02281–WHA v. PALMER LUCKEY, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTIONS
TO SEAL
Defendants. 18 19 Pending now are seven administrative motions to seal covering over a hundred documents filed in connection with defendants’ summary judgment and Daubert motions, as well as documents related to the Court’s prior order on supplemental briefing (Dkts. 312, 322, 327, 328, 329, 346, 352). The Court has reviewed these administrative motions and is shocked to see the parties wish to seal such trivia as: a. The statement “Can’t wait to try it” (Dkt 346-9, Exh. 16) as well as a reference to that statement in a brief (Dkt 346-3, Supp. Br. at 22); 26 b. Luckey’s statement in a 2012 email to Seidl that Luckey “Can't wait to get into this, very enthused” along Luckey’s name, email address, and c. Just the words “attached is an invoice” and “From: Palmer Luckey 1 palmertech@gmail.com” in a 2012 email (Dkt 346-11,…