Baker

Baker v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20213:20-cv-05467California3,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division STEVEN BAKER AND MELANIA KANG Case No. 20-cv-05467-LB D/B/A CHLOE’S CAFÉ, a California general partnership, individually and behalf of themselves and all others similarly ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO situated, DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, Re: ECF No. 48 v.

OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

18 Defendant. 19 INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs have a restaurant in San Francisco called Chloe’s Cafe. In response to the COVID- 19 pandemic, San Francisco prohibited indoor dining, and the plaintiffs lost money as a result. They submitted a claim for their business losses to their insurer, Oregon Mutual Insurance Company. Oregon Mutual denied the claim on the ground that the policy covered only business losses resulting from “direct physical losses” causing “direct physical loss of or damage to the insured property.” The plaintiffs then sued — on behalf of themselves…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.