Brown

Brown v. Brennan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20213:19-cv-05797California3,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MISTY DANIELLE BROWN, Case No. 19-cv-05797-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 52 MEGAN BRENNAN, Defendant.

Misty Danielle Brown, representing herself, sues her employer the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“Defendant”) and brings retaliation claims in her amended complaint under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701; specifically, retaliation arising from a disability discrimination complaint Ms. Brown filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (“EEOC’s”) Office of Federal Operations. (Dkt. No. 49.) Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Ms. Brown’s amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6). Defendant argues that Ms. Brown fails to allege facts sufficient to support a plausible inference that she suffered an adverse employment action. After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral argument on March 25, 2021, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.