Roshan
Roshan v. Lawrence
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PEYMAN ROSHAN, Case No. 20-cv-04770-AGT
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. POST-DISMISSAL MOTION
MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, et al., Re: ECF No. 37 Defendants.
14 On January 18, 2021, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss Peyman Roshan’s complaint without leave to amend on Younger abstention grounds. ECF No. 34. Judgment was entered the next day and the matter was closed. ECF No. 35. On February 16, 2021, Roshan filed an “Amended Motion for New Trial, to Alter and Amend Judgment, and for Relief from Order or Judgment” pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(a), 59(e), and 60(b). ECF No. 37. Defendants oppose the motion. ECF No. 38. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court found this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing. For the reasons that follow, Roshan’s motion is denied. * * * As an initial matter, Roshan’s request for a…