In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20214:19-cv-00325California3,183 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 19-cv-00325-HSG
IN RE TOY ASBESTOS ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
STRIKE OR EXCLUDE THE EXPERT
TESTIMONY OF ARNOLD BRODY
AND DENYING MOTION TO
EXCLUDE “EVERY EXPOSURE”
TESTIMONY
Re: Dkt. No. 432, 450, 453, 460, 468
13 Pending before the Court are motions to strike or exclude the anticipated testimony of Plaintiffs Agnes Toy and Thomas Toy, Jr.’s expert Dr. Arnold R. Brody, Dkt. Nos. 432, 453, and motions to exclude evidence or testimony that “every exposure” to asbestos causes mesothelioma, Dkt. Nos. 450, 460, 468. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to strike or exclude Dr. Brody’s…