In re Toy Asbestos Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20214:19-cv-00325California3,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 19-cv-00325-HSG

IN RE TOY ASBESTOS ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

STRIKE OR EXCLUDE THE EXPERT

TESTIMONY OF ARNOLD BRODY

AND DENYING MOTION TO

EXCLUDE “EVERY EXPOSURE”

TESTIMONY

Re: Dkt. No. 432, 450, 453, 460, 468

13 Pending before the Court are motions to strike or exclude the anticipated testimony of Plaintiffs Agnes Toy and Thomas Toy, Jr.’s expert Dr. Arnold R. Brody, Dkt. Nos. 432, 453, and motions to exclude evidence or testimony that “every exposure” to asbestos causes mesothelioma, Dkt. Nos. 450, 460, 468. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to strike or exclude Dr. Brody’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.