Robinson

Robinson v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20213:21-cv-00972California1,794 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADRIAN ROBINSON, Case No. 21-cv-00972-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

R. BROOMFIELD, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and he has consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. DISCUSSION Standard of Review Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer, or from an employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review the court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or those which seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings must be liberally construed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.