Zoom Video Communications, Inc. v. RingCentral, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20215:21-cv-01727California3,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS,

INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-01727-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX

PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

v. RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR AN

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

RINGCENTRAL, INC., PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 14 13 Plaintiff Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (“Zoom”) brings this action asserting breach of contract, violation of the federal Lanham Act, and other claims against Defendant RingCentral, Inc. (“RingCentral”) related to the parties’ Strategic Alliance Agreement (“SAA” or “Agreement”)—specifically, RingCentral’s continued marketing and reselling of Zoom’s products to new customers after Zoom’s decision not to renew the SAA. RingCentral has raised counterclaims based on Zoom taking steps to disrupt RingCentral’s ability to sell Zoom’s products to new customers. RingCentral asserts breach of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.