IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Case No. 19-cv-02033-YGR (JCS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

APPLE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 141 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION This discovery dispute involves a subpoena duces tecum (“Subpoena”) seeking documents from non-party Pegatron Corporation (“Pegatron Co.” or “Pegatron”), a technology manufacturer with its headquarters in Taiwan. Pegatron has refused to comply with the Subpoena on the ground that it was not served properly. It further asserts that the document requests in the Subpoena are excessively broad and unnecessarily burdensome, and that to the extent the Court orders that it comply with the Subpoena, the costs associated with producing the documents Plaintiff requests should be shifted to Plaintiff. As to the first issue, the Court finds that service of the Subpoena was proper. The Court further finds…