Daniels

Daniels v. Alphabet Inc.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20215:20-cv-04687California8,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARSHALL DANIELS, Case No. 20-cv-04687-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

ALPHABET INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

13 In this action against defendants Alphabet, Inc. (“Alphabet”), Google LLC (“Google”), YouTube, LLC (“YouTube”), and Does 1 through 10, plaintiff Marshall Daniels asserts the following claims: (1) violation of Mr. Daniels’s First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) conversion; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) breach of contract; (6) money had and received; (7) unfair competition under California Business and Professions Code §§ 17200, et seq.; (8) fraud in the inducement; and (9) wire fraud. Dkt. No. 1. Mr. Daniels asserts his First Amendment claim against all defendants and asserts the remaining claims against only YouTube and the Doe defendants. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.