Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 T.S., Case No. 19-cv-03658-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 25 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff T.S.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, et seq. T.S. claims that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) improperly discounted her testimony, did not properly evaluate certain medical opinions, and failed to consider whether she was disabled for a closed period. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers and the relevant evidence of record, for the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part 22 …