Denicolo
Denicolo v. Viking Client Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 RONALD G. DENICOLO, ET AL., CASE NO. 19-cv-00210-YGR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION 9 vs. Dkt. No. 130
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ET AL.,
11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Ronald G. DeNicolo, Jr. filed this putative class action complaint against Viking 13 Client Services, LLC, d/b/a Viking Billing Service (“Viking”) and The Hertz Corporation 14 (“Hertz”). On October 14, 2019, plaintiff Fox was added by an amended Complaint. Plaintiff 15 DeNicolo alleges four claims against Viking: violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection 16 Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. sections 1692f and 1692e; violation of the Illinois Vehicle 17 Code (“IVC”), 625 ILCS § 5/6-305.2; and declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Plaintiff 18 Fox alleges four additional claims against Viking for: violation of California’s Rosenthal Fair 19 Debt Collection Practices Act (the “Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Code § 17.1800; California’s Unfair 20 Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.; California Consumer 21 Remedies Act (“CCRA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§…