Turner
Turner v. Splunk Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERRANCE TURNER, Case No. 20-cv-04941-JSC
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL ORDER
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 26 SPLUNK INC., Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Terrance Turner, proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil action alleging a multi-billion dollar fraud involving the government and Defendant Splunk Inc. Splunk moved to dismiss Mr. Tuner’s complaint for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 24.) After Mr. Turner failed to respond to the motion to dismiss, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring him to do so and to show cause in writing as to why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 26.) Mr. Turner failed to respond to the Court’s Order and has not otherwise communicated with the Court. The Court thus DISMISSES this action for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(b). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the court may dismiss an action for failure to prosecute or to…