Norris

Norris v. Aon PLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20213:21-cv-00932California4,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 GISELE NORRIS et al., Case No. 21-cv-00932-CRB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

v. AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

AON PLC et al., Defendants.

Plaintiffs Gisele Norris and Henry Yuan have sued Defendants Aon PLC, Aon Group, Inc., and Aon Risk Services Companies, Inc. (collectively, Aon) for declaratory and injunctive relief relating to agreements they signed while employed by Aon. Norris and Yuan allege that the Restricted Stock Unit Agreements (“RSU Agreements”) that they both signed, and the Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement that Yuan signed, “contain a number of void, illegal, and unenforceable provisions, including restrictive covenants that violate well-established California law.” See Compl. (dkt. 1) at ¶¶ 15, 19, 27. Norris and Yuan have moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent Aon from enforcing those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.