Pardi

Pardi v. Tricida, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20214:21-cv-00076California1,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

MICHAEL PARDI, Case No. 21-CV-00076-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER APPOINTING LEAD

PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 16, 27, 31, 32 TRICIDA, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 On March 8, 2021, the Court received six competing motions to serve as Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel in this putative securities class action. ECF Nos. 11, 16, 23, 27, 31, 32. Only three motions remain pending. Specifically, on March 10, 2021, movant Michael Clynes withdrew his individual motion for appointment as Lead Plaintiff. ECF No. 41. On March 22, 2021, movant Geneva Acholonu filed a non-opposition to the competing motions. ECF No. 43. Lastly, movant Nancy Wang has abandoned her motion by failing to file an opposition or reply to the competing motions. ECF No. 16. Thus, the three remaining movants for Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel are: (1) Jeffrey Fiore represented by Block & Leviton LLP, ECF No. 11; (2) Donna Situ…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.