Finjan, LLC v. Qualys Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 FINJAN, INC., CASE NO. 4:18-cv-07229-YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
vs. IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
QUALYS INC., Re: Dkt. No. 156, 157, 158, 163 Defendant.
11 Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) brings this patent infringement action against defendant Qualys Inc. (“Qualys”) for direct and indirect infringement of its patents. Now before the Court is Qualys’ motion strike certain portions of Finjan’s infringement and damages expert reports. (Dkt. No. 158 (“Mot.”).) Qualys contends that Finjan’s expert, Dr. Nenad Medvidovic, introduced six new theories in his report that were not disclosed in Finjan’s infringement contentions. Having carefully considered the pleadings and the papers submitted,1 the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Qualys’ motion to strike. I. BACKGROUND Finjan accuses Qualys of infringing several patents, including U.S. Patent No. 8,225,408 (the…