Hamilton
Hamilton v. Barnes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON, ET AL., Case No.: 15-CV-1890 YGR
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS vs. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, ET AL., DKT. NO.
10 Defendants.
12 Presently before the Court, after remand from the Ninth Circuit, is the Motion of defendants 14 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”), W. Michael Barnes, Richard A. Bergman, John E. 15 Caldwell, Henry WK Chow, Bruce L. Claflin, Nicholas M. Donofrio, John R. Harding, Rory P. Read, 16 Thomas J. Seifert, Lisa T. Su to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff David Hamilton in 17 this shareholder derivative action. (Dkt. No. 61.) Having carefully considered the papers submitted 18 and the pleadings in this action, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion to 19 Dismiss WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 20 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Hatamian Securities Class Action On January 15, 2014, a federal securities class action lawsuit captioned Hatamian v. 23 Advanced…