In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20214:11-cv-06714California682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE APPLE iPHONE ANTITRUST Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR (TSH)

LITIGATION

DISCOVERY ORDER

10 Re: Dkt. No. 428 11

DONALD R. CAMERON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-03074-YGR (TSH)

Plaintiffs, v. Re: Dkt. No. 314

APPLE INC., Defendant.

EPIC GAMES, INC., Case No. 20-cv-05640-YGR (TSH)

Plaintiff and Counter- defendant, Re: Dkt. No. 395 v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant and Counterclaimant.

25 Apple and non-party Facebook have filed a joint discovery letter brief. 20-5640 ECF No. 27 395. In the letter brief, Apple moves to compel Facebook to produce some documents responsive to its subpoenas, so that it may adequately cross-examine Facebook’s VP of Gaming, Vivek Sharma, whom Epic Games has listed on its witness list for trial. ECF No. 376. The Court must first decide whether it may consider this motion at all. This motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.