Onn

Onn v. Carnival Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20215:20-cv-07929California652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 DANIEL ONN, Case No. 20-cv-07929-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

v. DISCOVERY

CARNIVAL CORP., et al., Defendants. [Re: ECF 45]

12 Defendant Carnival Corp. has filed a motion to stay discovery in this case pending the Court’s hearing of its motion to dismiss. See Mot. to Stay, ECF 45. Carnival argues that all three of Plaintiff Daniel Onn’s claims fail as a matter of law, and its motion is potentially dispositive of the entire case. See id. Mr. Onn opposes this motion on the grounds that much of the discovery pertains to facts Carnival put at issue in its own motion to dismiss, and even if the Court grants Carnival’s motion, it will likely do so with leave to amend. See Opp’n ECF 52. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES this motion. “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery when a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.