FullView, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20213:18-cv-00510California4,365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FULLVIEW, INC., Case No. 18-cv-00510-EMC

Plaintiff,

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

v.

POLYCOM, INC., Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff FullView, Inc. (“FullView”) accuses Defendant Polycom, Inc. (“Polycom”) of infringing U.S Patent No. 6,128,143 (the “‘143 Patent”). On March 23, 2021, the parties appeared before the Court for a claim construction hearing. The parties have asked the Court to interpret two terms that appear in claims 10 through 12 of the ‘143 Patent. For the following reasons, the Court adopts the constructions identified below. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background FullView, the owner of the ‘143 Patent and U.S. Patent No. 6,700,711 (“the ‘711 Patent”), asserts Polycom infringes on its patents. The ‘143 Patent relates to panoramic viewers used in videoconferencing devices. See Docket No. 75 (“SAC”) ¶¶ 12-13. More specifically, it describes a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.