Lyons

Lyons v. Alameda Health System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20214:20-cv-08088California4,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROSLYN HEAD LYONS, Case No. 20-cv-08088-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Alameda Health System’s motion to dismiss, for which briefing is complete. Dkt. Nos. 6, 6-1 (“Mot.”), 20 (“Opp.”), and 21 (“Reply”). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Roslyn Head, proceeding pro se, alleges claims under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff works as an Admissions Coordinator “in one of Defendant’s adult outpatient psychiatric programs.” Compl. ¶¶ 7–8. Plaintiff alleges that her co-worker, Nesbit Crutchfield, subjected her to “unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature at least twice a week through July 8, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.