Williams v. United Airlines, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 CLARENCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, No. C 19-02988 WHA v. || UNITED AIRLINES, INC., ORDER RE MOTION FOR Defendant CERTIFICATE OF , APPEALABILITY AS TO ORDER RE EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE

UNDER WIRETAP ACT

A The motion to certify under Section 1292(b) is DENIED. We are dealing

with an evidentiary issue. There is enough evidence to go to trial even if the recording is excluded. The appeal now will not materially advance the termination of litigation. See Lerner v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 690 F.2d 203, 211 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1982). 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: April 8, 2021. Pee {A> _ FX oe

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE