Holland

Holland v. City of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20213:19-cv-02545California823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL HOLLAND, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02545-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 87 Defendants.

12 On March 24, 2021, the Court granted the police officer defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding there was ample probable cause to arrest plaintiffs. Dkt. No. 84. The Court also sua sponte granted summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ 11th cause of action for malicious prosecution against Allied Security and one of its employees, Mark Hankins (the “Allied Defendants”). The 11th cause of action alleges Mark Hankins provided “false information to police” and “did not reasonably believe … probable cause … existed [to arrest plaintiffs].” Dkt. No. 32 at ¶¶ and 92 (First Amended Complaint). A key issue when evaluating the police officer defendants’ motion for summary judgment was Mark Hankins’ assertion that he saw plaintiffs exit an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.