Demassa

LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. Demassa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20213:18-cv-00043California4,770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE Case No. 18-cv-00043-MMC

P.C.,

9 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF DECISION; FINDINGS OF FACT AND v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CHRIS DEMASSA,

12 Defendant.

13 In this action, plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. ("LegalForce") alleges defendant Chris DeMassa ("DeMassa") and persons he employs are engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, thereby violating § 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code. On November 30, 2020, and December 1, 2020, the Court conducted a trial on LegalForce's claim against DeMassa. Wensheng Ma and Nicholas Craft of LegalForce appeared on behalf of LegalForce. Joyce Li and Andrew Jones of Durie Tangri LLP appeared on behalf of DeMassa. Having considered the evidence presented and the arguments of counsel, as well as the parties' posttrial filings,1 the Court rules as follows. //

25 1 On December 9, 2020, DeMassa filed a "Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.