Ramachandran
Ramachandran v. Best Best & Krieger
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 20-cv-03693-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. AMEND THE COMPLAINT
KIRK BALLARD, et al., [Re: ECF 109] Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Satish Ramachandran has filed a motion for leave to file an “Amended First Supplemental Complaint,” which would be the eighth version of his pleadings in this long-running neighbor dispute that is split between two different federal lawsuits. See Mot., ECF 109. Mr. Ramachandran seeks to add two new parties and new facts to his remaining malicious prosecution claim, information that was known to him when he previously petitioned this Court for leave to amend his complaint on November 30, 2020. See id.; see also Mot. to Amend, ECF 85. Defendants Kirk Ballard and Christopher Jordan oppose Mr. Ramachandran’s motion for further amendment, see Opp’n, ECF 120, and Defendant Pamela Jacobs joins in their arguments, see …