Tom

Tom v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20214:19-cv-06322California1,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JENNIFER TOM, Case No. 19-cv-06322-JST (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 83 ANDREW SAUL, Defendant.

13 Now pending before the court is a jointly filed letter brief (dkt. 83) setting forth a discovery dispute that boils down to Plaintiff’s request to compel the production of certain documents pertaining to a facet of the job description for a position in which she was formerly employed. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s request is denied.1 Plaintiff, who previously worked as a Benefit Authorizer for the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), has sued her former employer for employment and disability discrimination. See generally Amend. Compl. (dkt. 46) at 1-156. Plaintiff alleges that her former employer failed to accommodate her “known disabilities and medical needs” in that she required a fragrance-free and chemical-free workplace while employed at the SSA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.