Zoom Video Communications, Inc. v. RingCentral, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20215:21-cv-01727California4,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS,

INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-01727-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION; DISSOLVING

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

RINGCENTRAL, INC., ORDER; AND REFERRING ACTION

FOR A MANDATORY SETTLEMENT

Defendant. CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. No. 14 On March 16, 2021, Defendant RingCentral, Inc. (“RingCentral”) filed an ex parte motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin Plaintiff Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (“Zoom”) from taking technological steps to affect RingCentral’s ability to sell Zoom’s products to new customers. The Court issued an Order granting the TRO and enjoining Zoom from blocking activation of RingCentral’s new customers pending a hearing on the motion for preliminary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.