Barajas

Barajas v. Ashford TRS Walnut Creek LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20213:20-cv-01676California223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KATHLEEN BARAJAS, Case No. 20-cv-01676-CRB Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AS MOOT ASHFORD TRS WALNUT CREEK LLC, Defendant. On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff Kathleen Barajas sued Defendants Ashford TRS Walnut Creek || LLC and Does 1-10 for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh || Act. See Compl. (dkt. 1). On March 22, 2021, Ashford TRS moved to dismiss this case for lack a || of Article II standing and for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. See Mot. to 17 || Dismiss (dkt. 22) at 1. On April 2, 2021, Barajas filed an amended complaint (as she was entitled Z 18 || to do under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). See Amend. Compl. (dkt. 28); Fed. |] R. Civ. P. 15(a). Given the amended complaint, the Court denies Ashord TRS’s motion to dismiss 20 || the original complaint as moot. See Ramirez v. Cnty. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.