Britt

Britt v. ContextLogic, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20213:20-cv-04333California3,827 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIFFANY BRITT, Plaintiff, No. 3:20-cv-04333-WHA

v.

CONTEXTLOGIC, INC., ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION, DENYING

Defendant.

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

14 15 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action for online consumer transactions, plaintiff brings claims under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law alleging that defendant is deceptively and unlawfully functioning as an unlicensed distributor of contact lenses and failing to require purchasers to provide a prescription before purchasing contact lenses in violation of the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act, 15. U.S.C. §§ 7601–7610. At issue is whether plaintiff must arbitrate her claims under the mandatory arbitration provision in defendant’s terms of service. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s petition to compel arbitration is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.