Juarez
Juarez v. Social Finance, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RUBEN JUAREZ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03386-HSG Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION AND
v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
SOCIAL FINANCE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is the motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss filed by the Defendants Social Finance Inc. and Social Finance Lending Corp (collectively, “SoFi”). Dkt. No. 38. The Court held a hearing on December 3, 2020. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion to compel and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Ruben Juarez and Calin Constantin Segarceanu filed this putative class action against SoFi on May 19, 2020. See Dkt. No. 1. In July 2020, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 33 (“FAC”). In the amended complaint, Plaintiffs allege that SoFi denied their attempts to apply…